Stop, Look and Listen: Feminist Security Studies and its Bright Future

Though I'm no expert in feminism, I think it's safe to say we've seen strides in reframing the way people think about women's issues. The recent Steubenville rape case brought justice to the victim and persecuted the perpetrator. Women are no longer excluded from combat in the US military. Women's rights came to the forefront of the 2012 elections. Grassroots movements like Slutwalk and student-led sexual assault protests across university college campuses have been sprouting since 2011.

Now I know that each of these examples pose and have posed other consequences that conflict with Feminist Security Studies. Yes, women can now serve all positions in the military, but how is that an answer to mediating hegemonic masculinity and violence in the US military system? Of course, the Steubenville rape case was a win for proving that the absence of "no" is not consent, but what about the sympathetic media portrayal of these sexual offenders? Even though women's rights were at the center of the political process during elections, were they truly being acknowledged or just used as tactical strategies for winning over female voters? And do these student movements correctly and effectively bring forth these women's issues to the political conversation?

The silver lining amidst these flaws and imperfections, I think, is the fact that these issues are more visible than they were even five years ago. Women's issues are featured on TV, print sources like newspapers and magazines, and most definitely the Internet - especially on blogs like this one! We have the great pleasure of accessibility to free publishing via social media and have the power to spread the feminist perspective that early feminists didn't have - and I think this is largely why these issues have risen to the front of politics in recent years. The feminist perspective is more prevalent than it once was. No one can pretend that women's issues don't exist. No one can pretend that Feminist Security Studies isn't a "real thing." The truth is that more feminist narratives are put out there, and - despite the fact that there is indeed tension when someone even tries to mention feminism in conversation - society is growing more comfortable with acknowledging the feminist perspective.

Maybe it's not that more people are willing to stop, look for and listen to the feminist narrative, but it's definitely becoming more visible... and maybe even unavoidable. People are now given a plethora of information to see that the intersectionality of our identities truly affect our experience of the world - all women do not necessarily share the same kinds of oppression (Wibben 2011, p. 107). We already see change domestically in the framework of the United States (hoping that breaking the record of women elected into our legislative branch will soon begin to change things!), so perhaps this is the first stepping stone into looking past our borders and pursuing feminist narratives in International Relations as well. If we continue to progress in the way we already are, it may not be a far reach from getting a hand in IR - but before we do so, society must continue to "develop a willingness to listen and to consider another view of the world" (Wibben 2011, p. 111).

I should acknowledge, however, that this is coming from my perspective - my narrative. I am, after all, in the lovely city of San Francisco, and also a college student in an institute with a largely liberal population. I always wonder if my views are skewed simply because I'm in one of the most liberal parts of the country - but I digress. I still would like to believe that Feminist Security Studies is moving towards a brighter future, and I hope I get to learn more about it and grow with it as the time comes.

Wibben, A.T.R. (2011). Feminist security studies: A narrative approach. London, Routledge.