This same issue is one that is faced by politicians and activists all over the world. How much will one bend one’s principles in order to get the support (financial or otherwise) one needs to accomplish one’s goals? This quandary is highlighted when it is a marginalized population attempting to make change, because that group already faces so much pressure to capitulate to the dominant group’s principles.
Our class noticed that our guest speaker, Anu
Bhagwati, seemed to be grappling with this precise quandary. When she spoke to our class she was very open
about her qualms with the Iraq war, and the difficulties service members
face. Yet when she gave her public talk
she was much more one-sided and pro-military.
While I understand how unsettling it can be to see
someone act so differently from one situation to the next, I also understand
that navigating our current American legal system is an incredibly difficult
process that requires many different tactics and a great deal of flexibility. And as Anu says in her blog posting entitled
“Representing Women Soldiers in the Media: Stop Exploiting, Start Empowering”
(March 7, 2013), she has a personal commitment to trying to heal veterans
trauma. That is her goal, first and
foremost, and she is prepared to do a lot in order to achieve it.
This issue of flexibility vs. capitulation is one
that I expect to face many times in my career as an artist, and I believe that
keeping an open, self-reflective, inner dialogue based on the tenets of
feminist curiosity will help me navigate it.
http://www.pbs.org/pov/regardingwar/conversations/women-and-war/representing-women-soldiers-in-the-media-stop-exploiting-start-empowering.php
No comments:
Post a Comment